Saturday, March 05, 2005

1502 US Dead.

47% of Americans believe the war was a mistake, as opposed to 23% a year ago

Meanwhile, 48% of Americans believe that neither side is winning the war in Iraq.


And a recently released Italian hostage was fired on by American troops, wounding her and killing an Italian special agent who had negotiated with her captors and was now shielding her with his own body. Berlusconi's demanding a full inquiry. The Pentagon says that its troops followed all the appropriate procedures (waved hand signals, flashed lights, fired shots into the air).



On A Lighter Note:
- In 1919, disgruntled World War One veterans burned down Luton Town Hall, while a pianist played "Keep The Home Fires Burning" on a piano looted from a local music shop.

- The = sign was invented in the 16th century by a Welsh mathematician, Robert Recorde, who was fed up with writing 'is equal to' in every equation. He chose two lines because, "noe 2 thynges can be moare equalle".

- The Queen has never played dominoes, as she told prisoners this week.

- The Queen has also never used a computer, as she told Bill Gates when she gave him an honorary knighthood.

- The Sudanese government is complaining that the Sudan 1 food colouring should be renamed, as it leads to negative publicity for their country. They prefer it's formal name, 1-phenylazo-2-naphthalenol, rather than the Sudan 1 trade name, which was probably made up in the 1800s to sound all glamorous, exotic and hot. Strange, that Sudan sees a health scare in one country as a more negative advertisement for their country than, ooh, government-sponsored death squads murdering tens of thousands of civilians...

- The length of a man's fingers can tell you how physically aggressive he is. Basically, finger length and physical aggression are both believed to be linked to the amount of testosterone a foetus is exposed to in the womb. The shorter the index finger is, compared to the ring finger, the more boistrous you're likely to be.

- Nederland, a town in Colorado, is celebrating Frozen Dead Guy Day. No, seriously. A quote from the mayor: "The town is open to consider anything we can do for any foreign frozen dead people in stiff circumstances." For more: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/1872334.stm and http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/4320773.stm .

Friday, March 04, 2005

Reporting Politics, Former-Soviet Style

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/4317377.stm

The former Ukrainian Interior Minister, Yuri Kravchenko, has apparently shot himself on the day he was due to give evidence at prosecutors investigating the abduction and strangling of an anti-corruption journalist, Georgiy Gongadze. Gongadze was then decapitated and had acid poured over his remains in a clumsy atempt to conceal his identity. The head has never been found.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/correspondent/1932609.stm

Even at the time, the blame for the murder was pinned on then-president Leonid Kuchma.

The murder in 2000 sparked massive demonstrations against Kuchma's government, and an investigation was one of Victor Yushchenko's main electoral promises.

A few days ago, the Prosecutor General announced that Gongadze was murdered by Interior Ministry agents following a 'criminal order', and stated that he knew who gave the order, but would not name him.

Two of the alleged killers were policemen working for the criminal investigations directorate, part of the Interior Ministry.

Audio tape recordings allegedly have Kuchma ordering Kravchenko to "get rid of" Gongadze. Kuchma denounced these as fakes. Then a former presidential bodyguard announced that he had placed the bug, to expose the corruption at the heart of the Ukrainian government. He promptly fled to the US and went into hiding in New York with a bounty on his head.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/not_in_website/syndication/monitoring/media_reports/1047181.stm

In June last year, a parliamentary committee declared that Kuchma should be impeached over the murder, well before the November elections.

Between 1990 and 2000, 13 journalists died in suspicious circumstances in the Ukraine, and 'Kiev Taxi Rides' (a.k.a. abduction by government thugs) was a regular tool for dealing with loud-mouthed reporters.

People can be such bastards at times. Let's hope Kuchma gets what he (allegedly) deserves.

-----

And, while on the subject of bastards getting what they deserve: Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!!!

Karma in action, from what I've heard...

Monday, February 28, 2005

I'm Adolf Hitler's right foot...

...or some other bit that adds up to the appropriate proportion.

You scored as Democrat. <'Imunimaginative's Deviantart Page'>

Democrat

92%

Socialist

67%

Communism

67%

Anarchism

50%

Green

42%

Republican

33%

Nazi

8%

Fascism

0%

What Political Party Do Your Beliefs Put You In?
created with QuizFarm.com


I've got deep reservations about the neutrality of the questions in this quiz. There's a definite bias.

What the fuck kind of question is "Do you support the war in Iraq?" if not an ideologically loaded one? There are multiple reasons to be for the war, and multiple reasons to be against it (whether they're true or not):

For:
-Saddam's a threat to the United States's security.
-Saddam's a threat to US allies/interests in the Middle East.
-Saddam's in league with Al Qaeda.
-Saddam was responsible for 9/11.
-Saddam's an evil, murdering tyrant who's not fit to run a bath, let alone one of the most ancient countries on the planet.
-When Saddam eventually died, civil war would erupt as his sons fought over who succeeded him - the invasion, although bloody, saved more lives in the long term.
-The United States should finish the job it started twelve years earlier.
-Saddam plotted the assassination of George Bush Senior and should be brought to justice.
-Saddam gassed his own people at Halabja and should be brought to justice.
-Saddam Hussein is a Muslim and therefore it is our duty to bring freedom and Christianity to the Iraqi people.
-Saddam Hussein apparently has weapons of mass destruction, so he is incredibly dangerous to his neighbours. None of them are strong enough, or willing, to topple him, so it is down to the US and its allies.
-Saddam has WMDs. He hates us for driving him out of Kuwait. We have to get him before he gets us.
-Sanctions have killed over a million people in the past decade. The only alternative is to get rid of Saddam, which, in the long term, is far less bloody.

Against:
-Killing is wrong under any circumstances.
-Wars that aren't fought in self-defence are wrong.
-The principle of regime change sets a dangerous precedent.
-The United States shouldn't be poking its nose into foreign affairs, particularly militarily.
-The United States should be concentrating on tracking down Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaeda, not getting sidetracked by tinpot dictatorships that had absolutely nothing to do with 9/11.
-My country has extensive business dealings with Saddam's regime, and regime change will cost us billions.
-A wartorn or conquered Iraq will become a breeding ground for terrorists and a rallying cry to extremist Islam.
-The Middle East peace process is at a difficult stage, and an American-led war in the region will do nothing but harm it.
-So what if Saddam has WMDs: none of them have the range to hit us, so why should we worry about it?

Exactly how many different ideological slants can be put on those opinions?

And gun control? Hitler brought in total gun control to prevent revolution. Britain did the same to safeguard the public from lunatics, criminals and terrorists. How does wanting stricter (or more lax) gun control, in and of itself, indicate which party you fit into?

Anyway, having bitched about the suspected statistical invalidity of amateurish online quizzes, I've done another:

You scored as Charity. Charity- with you is the love that lifts the spirits of the world.

Prudence

86%

Charity

86%

Temperance

79%

Hope

79%

Justice

75%

Fortitude

50%

Faith

32%

The Seven Heavenly Virtues
created with QuizFarm.com


In other news:

I'm the Tabletop Rep-elect of LURPS.

The day after the election, I got a letter through from the Graduate Teacher Training Scheme, saying they'd passed my application onto St. Martin's. In other words, St. Martin's haven't closed the course yet. This means I may yet end up with an interview, and maybe even get onto the course. Since one of the questions asked of me at the hustings was, "Are you going to be doing teacher training next year?", to which I replied, "Almost certainly not," this throws an interesting spanner into the cooking pot. The odds are still well against me getting onto the course at this late stage, but I may have to juggle both positions. No way am I going to give up without even trying, should I get onto the course, but I also won't let LURPS suffer if my experience of teacher training is as draining as Mish's was. I think I have the advantage that
I will have a car if I get onto teacher training, thus making it far easier to commute around the place and make it to meetings on time, and so on. I also think I'm better at dealing with stress than Mish, no disrespect intended.

Anyhow, the odds are against me getting on the course.

Ah, yes, you'll never guess what else has happened...

Yep, that's right.

The fucking Job Centre are trying to screw me again. Last week, a letter saying I was only entitled to £20 a week, then one this week telling me to fuck off and die of starvation somewhere because I was earning too much to be on Jobseeker's Allowance.

All because they can't understand the concepts of 'casual work' and 'variable hours' and 'fucking incompetent civil servant fucktard'.

*sighs*

I'm going to go down there tomorrow and burn the place down.

Or go in and sort it all out.

One or the other.