Myk, on Students Unzipped (see left), just posted today's debate (his attempt at getting more people to comment on his diary): Is fox hunting a natural thing because foxes hunt too?

I thought I'd reproduce my comment here, for the enjoyment of anyone who ever actually visits this site. So far I've had one person visit that I know of (Mish - she still hasn't linked me from her website, like she promised!).

Anyway, my comment:

Hunt foxes because they hunt? What animal-killing psycho came up with that one?

By that logic, it's perfectly justified for us to load up with the biggest, high-calibre, military-grade weaponry we can find on the black market and camp out in fields, waiting to pop a few shots off at the wankers in red.

A simple scoring system:

10 points for every urban-based accountant or lawyer. This only applies if they're involved in the hunt, sorry.

15 points for country dwellers keeping traditions alive.

20 points for anyone trying to be incredibly English. This is doubled if they proceed to shout 'Tallyho!' or any such inane, antiquated utterances shortly before you blow the mother away.

25 points for anyone claiming to be looking after jobs in rural Britain (if they are also an urban-based lawyer or accountant, this is doubled).

30 points for aristocratic inbreeds with no chins, simply because killing off the weak assists natural selection.

A bonus of 100 points for any of the above who also read the Daily Mail because it's 'the only newspaper that tells it as it is'. These people have to be eliminated for the advancement of British society and the prevention of cultural stagnation.

There's a bonus of 50 points for every twat with a trumpet that you pop off, plus you get to mount the head above your fireplace to brag to your friends about.

I'll see you in the countryside...